The Raving Theist

Dedicated to Jesus Christ, Now and Forever

Harris v Sullivan

January 17, 2007 | 4 Comments

Sam Harris and Andrew Sullivan spar over whether the most important issue is religious truth or religious extremism — an issue explored by this blog here last year.

Comments

4 Responses to “Harris v Sullivan”

  1. severalspeciesof
    January 18th, 2007 @ 10:19 am

    I see it as an issue of truth wrapped in religious terms vs religious “truth/extremism”.

  2. Godthorn
    January 21st, 2007 @ 10:04 pm

    R.A., requiescant in pace!

  3. Spelling Hitler
    February 3rd, 2007 @ 9:07 pm

    Godthorn,
    correction: try “requiescat” in pace…

  4. Godthorn
    February 4th, 2007 @ 9:14 pm

    Spelling H, I had wondered whether someone would challenge that spelling, as it isn’t the customary one.
    You are half right.

  • Basic Assumptions

    First, there is a God.

    Continue Reading...

  • Search

  • Quote of the Day

    • Fifty Random Links

      See them all on the links page.

      • No Blogroll Links